![]() You can oppose having the list but you can't falsely claim there is a multi-year establish consensus. It can't be a consensus not to include if it regularly happens. Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 00:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC) There isn't a consensus not to add victims names into the related Wikipedia articles, as it has been done before for several other shootings. We aren't creating articles about these people. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:53, 16 February 2018 (UTC) I feel the names are notable in the context of the event which they are presented as such. If I couldn't see how 17/18ths of the actors in this story play a significant enough part in making it what is was to warrant one line each, I'd be sorry, too. ![]() But this event and this guy are known for nothing but their deadliness, and deadliness without the dead is absolutely nothing. MPS1992 ( talk) 00:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC) They didn't willingly do it. I would hope that would be their loweset priority. It is an insult to the victims to suggest that they died in order to create a Wikipedia article. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Sorry, InedibleHulk, but that does not make much or any sense. ![]() Do you think we'd be talking/thinking/writing about Nick Cruz if Nick Cruz showed up on Sunday and merely startled (or even killed) the janitor? A lot of people literally gave their lives to make this article, and the least it can do is acknowledge their attendance that day. This is the deadliest high school massacre the nation with the greatest number of high school massacres has ever known. The existence of sources to cite is not relevant, and the list ought to be removed.- Ohconfucius (on the move) ( talk) 00:16, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Those who want to find names of the dead can and do go to relevant news websites. ![]() It's a consensus that has existed for years, to avoid shrines being created.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |